After the COVID-19 pandemic stopped many asylum procedures throughout Europe, fresh technologies are reviving these types of systems. Coming from lie recognition tools analyzed at the edge to a program for confirming documents and transcribes selection interviews, a wide range of systems is being found in asylum applications. This article explores just how these technologies have reshaped the ways asylum procedures will be conducted. This reveals how asylum seekers are transformed into obligated hindered techno-users: They are asked to conform to a series of techno-bureaucratic steps and also to keep up with unstable tiny within criteria and deadlines. This obstructs all their capacity to work these systems and to pursue their legal right for safety.
It also displays how these types of technologies will be embedded in refugee governance: They facilitate the ‘circuits of financial-humanitarianism’ that function through a flutter of distributed technological requirements. These requirements increase asylum seekers’ socio-legal precarity by simply hindering them from getting at the programs of protection. It www.ascella-llc.com/asylum-procedure-advice further argues that studies of securitization and victimization should be combined with an insight in the disciplinary mechanisms of such technologies, through which migrants happen to be turned into data-generating subjects just who are self-disciplined by their reliability on technology.
Drawing on Foucault’s notion of power/knowledge and comarcal know-how, the article states that these systems have an natural obstructiveness. There is a double result: when they assistance to expedite the asylum procedure, they also help to make it difficult meant for refugees to navigate these systems. They are really positioned in a ‘knowledge deficit’ that makes these people vulnerable to illegitimate decisions created by non-governmental celebrities, and ill-informed and unreliable narratives about their cases. Moreover, they will pose new risks of’machine mistakes’ which may result in erroneous or discriminatory outcomes.